Hacker News new | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit login

You are reading way too much into it. This article is not trying to make the argument that Steve Jobs was irrelevant or less important for Apple than Tim Cook.



"But at this point, it seems clear to me that however superior Apple's design is, it's their business and operations strength — the Cook side of the equation — that is furthest ahead of their competition, and the more sustainable advantage."


Right, but you can't discount the vision that Jobs had to show Apple and everyone else that having products that are uncompromising on design + are solid technically will lead to great success.


"at this point" refers to their advantages now, not when it became clear to Gruber. It is not intended to discount anything that happened in the past.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: