Hacker News new | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit login

Flying a plane around the planet sounds a lot more expensive financially and thermodynamically than just beaming down images from an object constantly falling into the views you want to see.



You are only interested in urban areas which is less than 1% of total earth surface


It's also the case that often there are more legal regulations around aerial imagery compared to satellite imagery.


I looked it up. There are some satellite images, but a lot of it is done by aircraft.


Or you could just strap a camera to a few commercial airliners and have full coverage.


You'd only have full coverage of the jet routes. They don't just fly willy nilly across the globe.




Join us for AI Startup School this June 16-17 in San Francisco!

Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: