Hacker News new | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit login

Yes text is indeed devoid of context and sentiment. But to the main point, I fear that the comments on tone are a bit beside the point anyways. So let's move past that to talk about what I really wanted to comment on.

To be direct - yesterday I spotted what seemed like an Internet-wide issue that was also impacting Cloudflare. You told me yesterday that no in fact, there was no impact on Cloudflare. Today there is a post about a separate issue where there is an impact on Cloudflare. In my mind I make the connection between these two events, and on the one hand the quick and direct denial of the issue being that of Cloudflare on the first day, but today an acknowldgement of issues, even if they were a different set of problems.

It would be helpful on outages where Cloudflare is showing an outage when the problem doesn't originate with Cloudflare to put on your own error page an indication of where the error might be. I know this might be touchy to do so, but you should feel free to point fingers when you know that an outage to your client is caused by another party.

For example:

"Error. Cloudflare reports this site is down. Issues point to an outage with [AWS, Google, Azure, Oracle <-- just kidding] as being the source of that outage"

That would help make it clear that yes, there is an outage, and no, Cloudlfare is not the proximal cause.

All this chatter about your use of words and my use of words kinda misses the main point of what I was trying to communicate.




I think we may have done that in the past. I'll bring up internally.




Join us for AI Startup School this June 16-17 in San Francisco!

Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: