I wasn't around for the US Civil war either but I can still tell you that the idea that it was about states' rights is nonsense.
> or did you have a superior strategy for survival?
Frankl already had a superior strategy. He made himself useful to the Nazis running the camps and was treated better than his fellow inmates.
> Your comment is a vacuous, bald assertion that Frankl is "nonesense" and his ideas were a "schtick"
Do you really want me to explain why the idea that people died in concentration camps because they had bad attitudes is nonsensical?
I wasn't around for the US Civil war either but I can still tell you that the idea that it was about states' rights is nonsense.
> or did you have a superior strategy for survival?
Frankl already had a superior strategy. He made himself useful to the Nazis running the camps and was treated better than his fellow inmates.
> Your comment is a vacuous, bald assertion that Frankl is "nonesense" and his ideas were a "schtick"
Do you really want me to explain why the idea that people died in concentration camps because they had bad attitudes is nonsensical?