I think you jumped the gun trying to predict how this conversation would go
I am asking exclusively about the legal circumstance
And also stop acting confused at every response, this is a normal conversation where someone asks about the context and the other person replies with the answer, I skimmed the tweet thread but the background isn't familiar to me and thats what the point of the conversation is
You are too tuned to expecting an adversarial comment to defend, when thats not the case at all
Your first response made multiple strong claims and tried to state what my stance was with an explicit example. If you didn't know the context then you shouldn't have started with strong claims you didn't know the truth of. In addition, my original post made no claim of the legality of this situation and neither did you make any claims until this post. I merely claimed that this was a petty thing to do.
Trying to twist out of statements you made yourself and trying to play the victim when not winning an argument doesn't make for a useful conversation.
I am asking exclusively about the legal circumstance
And also stop acting confused at every response, this is a normal conversation where someone asks about the context and the other person replies with the answer, I skimmed the tweet thread but the background isn't familiar to me and thats what the point of the conversation is
You are too tuned to expecting an adversarial comment to defend, when thats not the case at all