Hacker News new | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit login

as a senior IC, I've been asked to give technical peer interviews for candidates quite a few times.

A LOT of the places I have worked there's no budget for sensible interview tools even for remote interviews (shared IDEs, etc), so you are stuck with what you can cobble together (an ad hoc shared REPL, a shared virtual whiteboard, etc). They suck a lot, and I try to keep that in account when working through problems.

The best experiences are always in an actual simple dev environment where you can collaborate on code, have a live preview of UI stuff, allow access to stack overflow and other references, etc. it allows you to present a problem very similar to day-to-day work but smaller scale.

And I gotta say, even that is just somewhat useful for gauging how working with that person for real would be. Interviews suck - nerves are frayed, it's not always representative of that persons skill, ability or non-assholishness, AND it doesn't allow for assessing general skill, ability to learn or ramp up, because everyone necessarily in the interview has to have some skill in the language and platform you are working in during the interview.




Join us for AI Startup School this June 16-17 in San Francisco!

Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: