Hacker News new | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit login

Was there ever any shred of evidence that the actions of SCO were influenced or directed by MS? I'm legitimately curious.



Mostly circumstantial, but I think the duck test passes:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/SCO-Linux_controversies#Microso...


It kind of funny when you think about it: Novell sold DR-DOS to Caldera specifically so Caldera could sue Microsoft (Novell didn't want to do it themselves for PR reasons). Caldera would reach a settlement with MS in 2000 and, later that same year, would use some of those funds to help finance their purchase of SCO.

It seems to me that, in a limited manner, Novell reaped what it sowed.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: