Again, I don't think your point was perfectly relevant. I believe that's why multiple people were picking on that particular nit.
I'm sorry I can't better help you understand which things I feel were mischaracterizations or conflated; it seems we're bound to be stuck at some lower levels of disagreement.
At least we can agree on not understanding each other! And, I suppose, that factory farms are a problem. Cheers!
And again, I'm sorry but I find that to be spurious, for reason's I've explained at length. You seem to feel there's too much conceptual distance between the hypothetical about speciesm and a comment about speciesm it was replying to.
So far as I can tell, what you are really objecting to is not my comment but to the idea of communicating through hypothetical examples.
I'm sorry I can't better help you understand which things I feel were mischaracterizations or conflated; it seems we're bound to be stuck at some lower levels of disagreement.
At least we can agree on not understanding each other! And, I suppose, that factory farms are a problem. Cheers!