Hacker News new | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit login

Why the avoidance of using the name? (I also notice "TP" is only ever used, never "Thinkpad").



From one of the blog posts[0]:

> There is also the threat of lawsuit. As I’ve later learnt, 51nb was sued by big L on the pretext that the images and website contained trademarked terms. However, the real reason was revealed that 51nb actually owned the tp.cn domain name and big L wanted it for themselves. Even though 51nb actually won the lawsuit, it hurt their financials badly and they were very reluctant on continuing these projects.

[0]: https://www.xyte.ch/2021/11/09/t700-part-1-preparation/


Magical thinking. Of course you can state matter of factly "this is not a Lenovo product" without violating trademarks.

OTOH maybe there is a real risk of getting sued, even if the lawsuit doesn't have merit. CentOS always avoided mentioning Red Hat and refered to the "upstream vendor". I think this was an agreement so that CentOS didn't show up as the first result for "Free Red Hat clone" and it was slightly less obvious to decision makers what it was.


One word: China.

They might be very much reasonable to behave as they do.


Trademark violation? Whether ungrounded or not, as a small player it's better to be cautious with corporations and their army of evil lawyers.




Join us for AI Startup School this June 16-17 in San Francisco!

Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: