Hacker News new | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit login

>The medical professional is greedy, i.e. they want to charge you as much money as possible, and they do not (per se) care about your health. They only care about your health as far as they can get money from you.

I'm not even going to read the rest of the article because the premise up front is so flawed. It assumes that doctors alone have say over pricing / compensation, and that's just not reality. It's much like engineers being blamed for things that rest entirely with management. It also makes the same flawed premise that I deal with in my profession every day - that I'm so greedy and so focused on my own pocketbook that I will screw over my clients. Are people motivated by money? Certainly. But a professional will put their client above money assuming no other perverse incentives.




This article was really trying to illustrate game theory concepts with a story about greedy doctors, but it was unfortunately framed as if it's trying to solve a greedy doctor problem using game theory. It might have fared better using different analogies.


This comment is like saying that Zeno’s paradox is dumb because proud Achilles would never consent to a foot race with a mere turtle - imagine the insult!


Look I understand in making the statement I made that I was hanging myself out there for further critique. My points were simply that:

1) The person doing the work often has limited say in the cost / compensation model unless they are also an owner.

2) Yes, there will always be people who prioritize money over the quality of their services. But reputation has a way of reducing their effectiveness.


It's not that you're wrong, it's that what you write only addresses the title of and first sentences of the article, rather than anything the article is actually trying to say.

This article is about game-theoretical-ideas of how to deal with the principal-agent problem. The "greedy doctor" idea is just a motivating example. You're seemingly taking offense at a knowingly fictional setup. That's akin to not wanting to learn how to solve physics problems about objects in a world where friction is assumed away, because that's not realistic. Umm, what?


"But a professional will put their client above money assuming no other perverse incentives."

After dealing with some surgeons I am not so sure about this anymore. They seem to feel very entitled to have big houses and nice cars.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: