Hacker News new | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit login

Someone called this to my attention in terms of making engineering interviews more fair, and there are some overlapping points, particularly with not biasing your interviews based on tooling:

https://faircoding.com/interviews/




[flagged]


> this guy is a fucking fake who would suck 2 dicks to get into FAANG in an instant and has no idea what coding interviews really entail.

The OP is here, is a part of the community and you should at least attempt to be decent to another human being.


Sure, I'll engage with OP. All he needs to do is reveal his identity on the website. After all, a majority of his points are based on his own personal experience so I certainly hope that his own personal experience isn't made up.


But he (or she) did. They engaged both as coscreen and with their personal account, and called it out clearly.


I know who the owner is, he isn't fake and reached out to me personally, but I didn't feel comfortable doxing him without his explicit permission.

I don't necessarily agree or subscribe to all of these points, just found it interesting there was someone very passionate about the process of software engineering interviews who had made an entire website dedicated to it.


very pedantic here. not sure what you mean by fake either, the author has commented quite a bit in this thread


The author of https://faircoding.com/ is here? You must be in the wrong thread sir.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: