Hacker News new | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit login

I thought the phrase was that, if you’re not paying, you’re the product. “If you’re paying, you’re not the product” doesn’t follow from that.



It's not true anyway, because of FOSS. There are also services that exist to provide a social good without a profit motive; that's why nonprofit designations exist.

That phrase has always seemed like an overly cynical take that normalizes antisocial/exploitive behavior by setting an expectation that free services should exploit the user in the first place.


So is it "with proprietary software you're always the product, but some offer you to pay for the privilege"?




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: