From the article: " this time suggesting that Apple misled the courts by offering altered images of Samsung’s Galaxy Tab".
Isn't it amazing that the court can make such wide-reaching decisions just by looking at images, rather than the actual devices? It would not be a very complicated thing to present the physical devices as evidence in this kind of case.
They make that because the evidence is given under oath and it’s supposed to be a quick (and preliminary) decision.
It’s also not the final decision. The evidence will be examined again at a later point in time and Apple is liable for all damages should the court decide against them at that point.
Isn't it amazing that the court can make such wide-reaching decisions just by looking at images, rather than the actual devices? It would not be a very complicated thing to present the physical devices as evidence in this kind of case.