Hacker News new | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit login

True. Perhaps my issue is that I know how that's implemented and my brain can't see it the same as sequential statement execution ;)



This is a function of familiarity though. Get familiar with it and you'll understand it just fine.

If you want to talk more about it, feel free to email me.


I think dboreham's objection was exactly the opposite!


Idk i mean simply knowing what the code for >> looks like doesn't mean you're used to thinking in that way.

There was a time years ago when someone was showing me the types of (>>) and (>>=) in Haskell and my question was "ok, but what does that have to do with IO?!?"




Consider applying for YC's Spring batch! Applications are open till Feb 11.

Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: