> I’m all for addressing concerns. But how is anyone supposed to address a concern like “there are vague imperceptible threats to my existence all around me which I can neither articulate nor provide evidence of”? What, exactly, are you proposing Coinbase or any or company should do, specifically?
That's the whole idea behind "microaggressions", anything can be deemed a threat, it only depends on the alleged victim's perception, it's cunning, like every 'intersectional', it's full of sophism, doublespeak, newspeak, absurdity yet a lot of FAANG adopted this framework without thinking. Well now they have to deal with activist employees who are there just to betray or embarrass their very employer and harass other employees into ideological submission.
That's the whole idea behind "microaggressions", anything can be deemed a threat, it only depends on the alleged victim's perception, it's cunning, like every 'intersectional', it's full of sophism, doublespeak, newspeak, absurdity yet a lot of FAANG adopted this framework without thinking. Well now they have to deal with activist employees who are there just to betray or embarrass their very employer and harass other employees into ideological submission.