I take commercial acceptance as a proxy for the acceptance and practicality of artificial intelligence at the 'everyday' task of driving. I would take the absence of commercial acceptance as evidence that artificial intelligence is not up to the 'everyday' task of driving.
> I would take the absence of commercial acceptance as evidence that artificial intelligence is not up to the 'everyday' task of driving.
The most interesting thing Tesla is doing to make "acceptable" FSD possible is to open an insurance company.
So commercial acceptance is proxy for capability, but it is not immune to regulatory moat building (or alternatively, go the other way - like, force 80+ year olds to drive enhanced cars).
There's some ways around it, but that problem isn't a technology one.
Momentum is still a thing regardless of where the technology is.
The current fastest production car in the world (and of all time) is an electric car, but most cars are still not electric. That doesn't mean gas cars are "better cars" than electric ones.
