On: Unified Shader Programming in C++

[oddity]

Well, one of the authors is from NVIDIA, and the paper already mentions CUDA, and it's only to argue that CUDA is a good point of reference but doesn't do what the authors need it do (shader programming). SYCL doesn't add anything to that conversation other than being yet another example.

[nextaccountic → oddity]

> SYCL doesn't add anything to that conversation other than being yet another example.

It's important to cite prior work in academic papers, nonetheless