> looking at this HN thread, it seems like my assumption may be correct
that has got one guy complaining about fdb, and a couple of others saying positive things.
so in short, you've got no experience with fdb, wrote a couple of paragraphs of speculation and references to other systems, and then declared victory, hoping nobody would read the other thread, i guess.
i've written stuff against fdb, and i've seen it in non-trivial production. it's not a panacea, it's a useful point in the design space of databases, and does pretty well there.
that has got one guy complaining about fdb, and a couple of others saying positive things.
so in short, you've got no experience with fdb, wrote a couple of paragraphs of speculation and references to other systems, and then declared victory, hoping nobody would read the other thread, i guess.
i've written stuff against fdb, and i've seen it in non-trivial production. it's not a panacea, it's a useful point in the design space of databases, and does pretty well there.