> But this would be achieved in part via more uniformity, standardization, and stability of food processes. Government managed food would end up with less variety and adaptation to individual circumstances and preferences, and this food would improve and innovate less over time.
Why would a public service for food have less diversity and innovation? A public service is operated by individuals, and doesn't have to be centralized or hierarchical.
I agree with the point that reducing competition (by enabling cooperation) can be very efficient. But i strongly disagree it has to lead to centralization and therefore less options. If anything, capitalism leads to less choices because you need big money to even exist in a certain consumer space. There is currently no avenue for "garage innovators" to innovate and spread their products... a public service could (if not operated USSR/USA style) foster cooperation and innovation across the board.
Why would a public service for food have less diversity and innovation? A public service is operated by individuals, and doesn't have to be centralized or hierarchical.
I agree with the point that reducing competition (by enabling cooperation) can be very efficient. But i strongly disagree it has to lead to centralization and therefore less options. If anything, capitalism leads to less choices because you need big money to even exist in a certain consumer space. There is currently no avenue for "garage innovators" to innovate and spread their products... a public service could (if not operated USSR/USA style) foster cooperation and innovation across the board.