> I suspect that this data is being deliberately withheld because it would suggest that frontline workers don't need vaccines, or at the very least don't need a mandate.
Of all the possible reasons you couldn't find this data, a vast conspiracy is the most likely cause? Come on.
Don't you think it would be a public service for news to report such information? Have it listed somewhere conveniently?
It would literally be the most accurate look at worse case constant exposure.
I'm not implying any sort of conspiracy, just an emergent combination of social pressure and implicit taboo. Lots of powerful and not so powerful reputations are riding on the "danger" of this virus and the "safety and efficacy" of the vaccines. And if that's not enough for you, don't forget that fear gets clicks.
Of all the possible reasons you couldn't find this data, a vast conspiracy is the most likely cause? Come on.