Submitter's note: I submitted this tweet rather than the original article because it highlights an aspect of the piece that I think should be highlighted, and I would not have been able to highlight that aspect if I had submitted the original article.
The Urban Institute article linked in the tweet is definitely worth reading on its own and makes valid points, but I think we need to reflect on whether it is a good idea to redefine objectivity and rigor in narrow ways that make them "harmful research practices".
The Urban Institute article linked in the tweet is definitely worth reading on its own and makes valid points, but I think we need to reflect on whether it is a good idea to redefine objectivity and rigor in narrow ways that make them "harmful research practices".