Why would posting evidence of a massive increase in people declaring themselves trans be evidence of a conspiracy versus, say - an example of an on-topic relevant comment?
On its own perhaps it wouldn’t be. It would be a stretch and not an exact equivalency. But I could, perhaps, see someone using it as an example. But considering how political it is, and how many other examples you could find to use I can’t help but think: Maybe the half a dozen comments throughout the thread, trying to make the two situations seem the same, aren’t exactly in good faith.
It was an obvious-enough thought to me that I searched the page to see if anyone had made the comparison. I was not, of course, paid or otherwise influenced to do so.
