Hacker News new | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit login

To me, it seems like going up a layer in biological "abstraction"...



Because the process that constructs a body part is only partially genetic, you'd be leaving out meaningful data.

Mistaken idea: genes are like a program in code that defines what biology does.

More accurate idea: genes are like the NVRAM of a running program that has run continuously with in-place updates for 4 billion years.


> More accurate idea: genes are like the NVRAM of a running program that has run continuously with in-place updates for 4 billion years.

They also represent the NVRAM of the compiler that builds both the program and the compiler itself :)


What an amazing comment, that just blew my mind. Talk about a paradigm shift.


So, we know that human-like general intelligence is possible because we display it right? We're pretty sure it has something to do with that soft stuff inside our brain-baskets, and how that soft stuff is interconnected. We've found computational primitives that we call neurons, so the premise goes, if we can understand and copy how it works we can engineer intelligence. Right? So going to genetics, while interesting and worthy, isn't really going up a level of 'abstraction' because we're trying to get a systems level overview here.

It is a process somewhat like studying a CPU by shocking prongs and occasionally slicing it real thin to see inside it.




Consider applying for YC's W25 batch! Applications are open till Nov 12.

Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: