Your comment gave me the impression that Daniel Walsh made some refutation against that podman-machine is being deprecated, but the Tweet you link to say no such thing, unless it's hidden in some sub-tweet (Twitters UX is horrible to discover things).
I'm not sure if it was you that downvoted me, but you are mistaken.
boot2podman/machine, what you linked, is not an official part of podman. It is a third party equivalent and not relevant. The official podman repository is https://github.com/containers/podman, and the machine bits are integrated and part of podman proper:
If it was you that downvoted my comment, please consider not doing that because you disagree. The comment was factually correct and made in good faith. You're equating a third party deprecated podman-machine with the integrated into upstream podman machine. We were not referring to the same thing whatsoever.
Thanks for clarifying! My mistake in confusing the two, hopefully one can understand how another can make the mistake though as one is named "podman machine" and the other "podman machine".
My main issue with your comment (https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=28391265) still stands, you're linking a third-party source with the impression that that source said it's in fact not being deprecated, when there is no such text in that source.
I did not downvote you, but I can absolutely understand why someone would do that, since the tweet seemingly has nothing to do with the comment your original comment was replying to.
For what it's worth, complaining about downvotes is almost never worth it. Makes for boring reading and the people downvoting you won't read it anyways.
I'm saying the source is saying this is what to use, which was confirmed by reading the source and seeing the "deprecated" version was not even related to the project whatsoever.
Dan is the guy that has been with the docker project through the redhat fork and to the creation of podman from the very beginning. If he says podman machine is what to use, it is not deprecated. Have you ever listened to Dan speak? He's very pragmatic about these things.
Being one of the authoritative decision makers, if he says to use it, it is not deprecated. A literal 1 minute perusal of the podman upstream source confirmed.
What you linked to is podman-machine. podman machine is not the same. The former was probably deprecated because podman machine is now part of podman itself.
podman-machine was a project disconnected from Podman. The podman project recently added a new command to podman `machine`.
The `podman machine` command downloads and runs VMs with the podman service enabled within them. It also configures the native podman to use ssh to connect to the podman within the VM to allow the allusion of native podman support on the host. This is the exact same thing that Docker desktop does.
We will contact the podman-machine developers to update their website to point out that `podman machine` is the way to go, to get a VM running podman on your host system.
This is what the the podman-machine github says under the DEPRECATED section:
`
DEPRECATED:
Podman v3.3 now has a podman machine included, different from podman-machine
This is a new feature based on QEMU and CoreOS, unlike the old one (described here)
which is based on Docker Machine and Boot2Docker, as was available in Docker Toolbox...
`
Going straight to the source (https://github.com/boot2podman/machine), it says the following:
> DEPRECATED (with huge letters)
> Podman Machine is now deprecated. Users should try using Vagrant instead.
So one can safely assume that podman-machine is in fact getting deprecated.