The article doesn’t research whether he’s reformed or still a bully. Or whether the position is important or not. These are important details.
Maybe the position is BS and doesn’t have much authority. Maybe he’s learned the error of his ways.
Without useful information this article is lame as it seems to link the suspension with the promotion.
This article is so frustrating and the author is a bit lazy, I think.
Labeling someone a "bully" has become the easy way to bring a person down. There could be personal vendetta. I've read the accusations against him, and they cannot be called "bullying". Need definitive proof.
I don't really understand people attempting to tie prosperity to morality.
An adult man being a bully in a professional environment?
No one should care about him. Fire him and let him try and find a job somewhere else.
The article doesn’t research whether he’s reformed or still a bully. Or whether the position is important or not. These are important details.
Maybe the position is BS and doesn’t have much authority. Maybe he’s learned the error of his ways.
Without useful information this article is lame as it seems to link the suspension with the promotion.