The common, instinctive reaction in tech circles & HN seems to be some version of "consumer action," vote-with-your-dollar stuff. This isn't going to work. It almost never does. At most, it'll be affect a minor tweak or delay.
This is a political issue, IMO. A thousand people protesting outside Apple HQ and/or stores is worth more than 100 thousand consumer striking. IMO, the main non-political avenue here is alternatives, especially FOSS alternatives. It's hard to see a way to widely adopted FOSS phones from here, but if we had a viable alternative things would look different. That's producer action, rather than consumer action.
Make it an issue in elections. Stand outside Apple stores with a sign. Push for a Digital Freedom law. Etc. An Apple labour union, maybe. The conscious consumer game is a dead end. It usually is.
> The common, instinctive reaction in tech circles & HN seems to be some version of "consumer action," vote-with-your-dollar stuff. This isn't going to work. It almost never does. At most, it'll be affect a minor tweak or delay.
If "vote with your wallet" doesn't work and only causes, say, 1 million people (out of the billion+ customers) to switch off of iOS, doesn't that mean that the rest of the billion+ people really don't care enough? Maybe a few million more accept the tradeoff of getting iOS for 'scanning my photos for csam and having the ability to move off of iOS later if they expand usage or this system otherwise has issues'.
Maybe, just maybe, even if a million people complain about this and apple loses an extreme amount of iPhone sales upwards of 20 million, they can still sell 220 million[0] iPhones to people who don't care. We are certainly the vocal minority here - whether or not that warrants government intervention or otherwise harms our society doesn't really matter when Apple still makes tens of billions in profit a quarter.
>>If "vote with your wallet" doesn't work and only causes, say, 1 million people (out of the billion+ customers) to switch off of iOS, doesn't that mean that the rest of the billion+ people really don't care enough?
IMO, no. This is silly logic. I don't particularly care that Apple scan my photos.
First, most people don't care about or understand any particular issue well. You might care about the freedom issue here. Another person cares about oceanic biodiversity. Another person cares about factory working conditions. All of them make purchasing decisions that affect all of these. The civilians will always outnumber activists 100-1 on any particular issue.
Second, in this particular case, choices are few and poor. Hence exasperated declarations of going back to dumb phones or DIYing something.
Third people's individual purchasing decisions don't have any effect on the thing they're trying to affect.
In any case, my point was empirical, not theoretical. There are very few significant examples of consumer action amounting to anything. Where it has (eg dolphin safe tuna), consumer action was one piece of a much bigger puzzle, and more about raising awareness than direct. IE people buying dolphin safe tuna also become insistent on regulatory action. By the same logic, you could conclude that people don't care enough about anything. In which case, we come to the same conclusion.
This is a political issue, IMO. A thousand people protesting outside Apple HQ and/or stores is worth more than 100 thousand consumer striking. IMO, the main non-political avenue here is alternatives, especially FOSS alternatives. It's hard to see a way to widely adopted FOSS phones from here, but if we had a viable alternative things would look different. That's producer action, rather than consumer action.
Make it an issue in elections. Stand outside Apple stores with a sign. Push for a Digital Freedom law. Etc. An Apple labour union, maybe. The conscious consumer game is a dead end. It usually is.