>>>>Protect by a world superpower military and diplomacy,
>>That's the argument the British crown once made for taxation without representation. ...
IIRC Those living outside of the US still have the right to cast votes for President, and are not compelled to pay non-federal taxes. An argument might be made for non-state citizens to at least have a single representative and senator they can vote for.
>>>> (social programs)
>> ... Ponzi-scheme ...
I agree about the problems with the funding and fulfillment structure. However the reality still exists even if the current implementation is unfair for those of us not yet seeing the benefits. If you're also a US citizen, please vote to get this fixed.
-- The next set of points contradict my historically long viewed claim of stability. Generally both viewpoints are correct; though I would like to compare the current issues with the virus and unrest in the US to the latest 6 WEEKS lockdown in portions of Australia. Stability is __relative__.
-- The last point was my hopeful view for benefits I'd prefer all US taxpayers to receive in the future. If your opinion differs from mine, you could share what other befits you'd like to see instead.
Legally: yes, federal law says that you have to be allowed to vote for the federal offices from wherever you last lived in the US (or your American parent, if you were born abroad but never lived in the US)
Reality: some states make it easy and will even let you vote in state and local elections, others make it inconvenient if you’re not with the military (have to request ballots every year, have to diligently watch for registration purges), and some make it practically impossible for non-military.
If you’re an American abroad having trouble registering and/or getting your ballots, your local Democrats Abroad chapter has someone who will help you out. Even if you’re a Republican ;)
I want as many US citizens abroad as possible to vote on a regular basis, even if they’re voting differently from me: our representatives will pay more attention to us if they see that we vote in larger numbers.
Is there a way to, even approximately, target the "social security system" issue with your vote? Or do you have to chose between 2 or 3 bundles of pre-chosen policies, the composition of which you had no say in?
>>That's the argument the British crown once made for taxation without representation. ...
IIRC Those living outside of the US still have the right to cast votes for President, and are not compelled to pay non-federal taxes. An argument might be made for non-state citizens to at least have a single representative and senator they can vote for.
>>>> (social programs)
>> ... Ponzi-scheme ...
I agree about the problems with the funding and fulfillment structure. However the reality still exists even if the current implementation is unfair for those of us not yet seeing the benefits. If you're also a US citizen, please vote to get this fixed.
-- The next set of points contradict my historically long viewed claim of stability. Generally both viewpoints are correct; though I would like to compare the current issues with the virus and unrest in the US to the latest 6 WEEKS lockdown in portions of Australia. Stability is __relative__.
-- The last point was my hopeful view for benefits I'd prefer all US taxpayers to receive in the future. If your opinion differs from mine, you could share what other befits you'd like to see instead.