Man, what an uncanny trip! I don't mean to say it's any less impressive, but it was uncanny.
The surrealist nature of the piece notwithstanding, I was bothered by some of the artistic decisions made in the pictures. Maybe the lack of (traditional) perspective; but even that I can chalk up to a conscious Escherian aesthetic. I was also slightly bothered that the images were not available in higher resolution. Surely that should go without asking, in a piece going for this kind of artistic subject matter?
> We believe that every book contains a world. But more than just believe, we know this, because we know that our world is made out of words. The person who created our world thought of words to describe just one of the rooms in our library, then saw it, and was so amazed at its beauty that he described more and more, and saw more and more.
I got chills when I first read this because it's so meta. Then I got to the behind-the-scenes explainer of the methodology and this quote (which, to be clear, I'm aware R. Moulton himself wrote) just reached another level of meta, if that's possible.
I was also confused by the small size of the images, and the small incongruities in them, but I didn't realize they were ML-generated, I thought it was some surreal and elaborate way of illustrating.
The narrative really throws you off because it's clearly human, and I'm glad the small images didn't spoil the trick too soon.
I'd suggest reading it in Firefox's Reader mode. It placed each image before its corresponding text, which led me to believe they were small for that purpose. Really added to the experience, I believe, since I didn't have any doubt as to why the images were the size they were.
Now I'd love to see a full book set in the world of this library, though.
Still I only said to myself 'maybe' because the art seemed so original up to that point. I wonder what the source material looks like? It is perhaps collaging and laundering the original work more than it is generating it.
The surrealist nature of the piece notwithstanding, I was bothered by some of the artistic decisions made in the pictures. Maybe the lack of (traditional) perspective; but even that I can chalk up to a conscious Escherian aesthetic. I was also slightly bothered that the images were not available in higher resolution. Surely that should go without asking, in a piece going for this kind of artistic subject matter?
My suspicions peaked at https://moultano.files.wordpress.com/2021/07/1626575570_the_... because it really does not look like a cafeteria to me.
And when I got to the coda, it all made sense.
Long-ish PS:
> We believe that every book contains a world. But more than just believe, we know this, because we know that our world is made out of words. The person who created our world thought of words to describe just one of the rooms in our library, then saw it, and was so amazed at its beauty that he described more and more, and saw more and more.
I got chills when I first read this because it's so meta. Then I got to the behind-the-scenes explainer of the methodology and this quote (which, to be clear, I'm aware R. Moulton himself wrote) just reached another level of meta, if that's possible.
Thanks for the tour. I enjoyed it!