I see you have further built conclusions on-top of an incorrect assumption about my OP.
> The only reason this would be unfair is if you pre-suppose that, more than 50% of the time, the "most qualified" person is a man
I actually think discriminatory promotions is pretty unfair. Just because you think it's justified doesn't make it "fair". You can tell it is because of the term "discriminatory".
> The only reason this would be unfair is if you pre-suppose that, more than 50% of the time, the "most qualified" person is a man
I actually think discriminatory promotions is pretty unfair. Just because you think it's justified doesn't make it "fair". You can tell it is because of the term "discriminatory".