Every single government uses such tools. The ones that don't likely have bigger problems such as sustenance, lack of electricity, etc.
What people should be looking at is the crazy amount of Israeli presence in the so called cyber security sector. I can think of a few such companies that literally spy and track hundreds of thousands of people all over the world. The government is using their services and therefore lets them whatever they want.
I know a few guys working for such companies. No longer friends with them. Works foriteral evil. No better than military types
> What people should be looking at is the crazy amount of Israeli presence in the so called cyber security sector.
Limiting the ability of nations to export this kind of capability as a product for other entities to use is precisely what "trade ban" would do.
You're right that a trade ban won't affect the ability of nations to develop and deploy their own spyware, but most of the targets in the Pegasus dump seem to be of people peripheral to smaller governments that don't have this kind of capability themselves (which is exactly why they buy it!).
For a start, yes. Also Israel, of course, and anywhere else countries host these kinds of malware companies. A trade ban would inevitably be best implemented via a treaty, but there's no reason unilateral action can't happen first.
I can't tell what your point is, exactly. You're just making a cynical point that this won't work so we shouldn't even try?
> Nations that want to do this will do it, and trade bans won't stop them.
Again, that's experimentally false. Saudi and Mexico didn't develop their own home-grown spyware. They bought an Israeli product instead. This stuff is harder than you think.
this stuff is vastly easier than traditional weapons development.
if you're in a precarious political position, a homegrown entity that produces these tools can quickly become a threat; the citizens you train/employ will have their own political ambitions, nationalistic tendencies, empathy for their fellow citizens, etc.
there are most certainly situations where it's safer to just outsource your natsec/tradecraft to an entity that only cares about their bottom line.
> this stuff is vastly easier than traditional weapons development.
Saudi and Mexico don't produce many homegrown weapons systems either. Again, non-proliferation is well-travelled territory. In fact most of these things are not something small governments will have access to if big governments don't give it to them. And treaties restricting trade in these things are known to work.
Every single government uses such tools. The ones that don't likely have bigger problems such as sustenance, lack of electricity, etc.
What people should be looking at is the crazy amount of Israeli presence in the so called cyber security sector. I can think of a few such companies that literally spy and track hundreds of thousands of people all over the world. The government is using their services and therefore lets them whatever they want.
I know a few guys working for such companies. No longer friends with them. Works foriteral evil. No better than military types