There are many countries with many different jurisdictions and drug safety requirements, and not all vaccines passed all jurisdictions’ rules.
Also, I’m no lawyer, but I would expect an act of negligence — as compared to “risks inherent in bringing forward new products to prevent severe cases of a virulent disease with known severe side effects in a significant minority of those not killed by it” — is already frowned upon by the law, and criminal misconduct already comes with prison time?
Even in the most pessimistic assumptions of vaccine safety, the disease is much worse than the cure, and yet I don’t believe anyone is seriously suggesting D Trump or B Johnson goes to The Hague for an unfriendly chat about Crimes Against Humanity.
> I don’t believe anyone is seriously suggesting D Trump or B Johnson
I wasn't only talking about D Trump or B Johnson. Both are complicit for spreading the bioweapon. I'm talking about Fauci & the other bioweapon pushers who are committing genocide.
The factor that is being ignored is that vaccine injuries are being reclassified as Covid or a coincidence unrelated to the vaccine. Tobacco Science had a similar technique.
If a researcher makes a novel vaccine with side effects even as tenth as bad as either long COVID or independently the death rate of COVID itself, I would expect the researchers to abandon it instead of wasting time attempting to start human trials.
I am aware many people simply don’t believe in the health impacts of COVID/long COVID, but that’s over optimism about the disease rather than pessimism[0] about the treatment.
[0] I also ought to have clarified: maximum rational pessimism, not conspiracy theories.
The focus on GBS is clearly cherry-picking one of the rarer and more transient adverse side effects, observed in a by now barely used vaccine, in order to take up oxygen in the vaccine risks discussion and present the appearance of being on top of it. Says a lot that it is getting as much FDA attention as myocarditis, which is much more common (Israel estimated between 1 in 3000 and 1 in 6000 in men 16 to 24, far higher than the deceptive "few per million" presented in the article) and potentially more lasting.
