Hacker News new | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit login

Yep, that would help. From what I can tell, the wheelchair patent is aspirational and they haven't actually implemented the majority of standard autonomous vehicle practices.



The patent office should start demanding working models for everything. You shouldn't patent something unless it actually works.


Maybe demand a working model for the patent, but also reject a patent if anybody else has something similar in development?

So you have a brilliant idea like "lets put email on a cell phone", but the infrastructure isn't in place to support it yet. A few years later you finally get it working, but now you can't patent because there are 5 other companies who started the process at basically the same time--once the prerequisite technology was in place.

This would reduce the number of patents on "the most obvious way to solve this obvious problem that only appears because the technology has advanced enough" that patent trolls love.

So many of the "do X, but now on a computer" patents wouldn't be a thing.

Requiring a working prototype would also make it hard to issue vaguely worded and extremely broad patents, so someone can't claim ownership over the entire concept of sending push notifications for example.


Incidentally, in the US from 1790 to 1880, supplying a working model was indeed a prerequisite for a patent application.


one issue is that you might not want to start prototyping something (for cost reasons) until you have a defensible moat.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: