As I said, it is impossible to report on trump without being somewhat negative because very little that he did could be spun in a positive manner. This doesn't justify keeping a camera on his empty podium at one of his rallies while other candidates are giving speeches.
Clicks, and views.
Also your post doesn't really match what you claim it does - in no way does NPR admit that the coverage was unfairly negative. It seems to say it was negative because trump had little substance to his policies and there weren't many positive things to say about the job he did.
Which makes sense given the results of his presidency (coup attempt, many convicted associates pardoned, hundreds of thousands dead due to incompetence/lying, economic collapse, destruction of American family farming, etc.)
Clicks, and views.
Also your post doesn't really match what you claim it does - in no way does NPR admit that the coverage was unfairly negative. It seems to say it was negative because trump had little substance to his policies and there weren't many positive things to say about the job he did.
Which makes sense given the results of his presidency (coup attempt, many convicted associates pardoned, hundreds of thousands dead due to incompetence/lying, economic collapse, destruction of American family farming, etc.)