Hacker News new | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit login

There's no comma after that phrase indicating that it's a separate item in the list.

I believe that is intended to be read as "digital electronic product or embedded software found in medical settings."

After all, the description of what the bill does apply to is "digital electronic equipment". Interpreting it to apply to "equipment" but not "products" doesn't really make sense.




Correct. That exemption is for medical equipment.

California's Right to Repair bill, which got very close to passing this year, was solely focused on medical equipment. https://leginfo.legislature.ca.gov/faces/billStatusClient.xh...




Join us for AI Startup School this June 16-17 in San Francisco!

Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: