Hacker News new | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit login

Are you saying im.getWidth() is doing some expensive calculation underneath, or that the cost of calling it is expensive in Javascript?



I imagine it loops though the full width of the image every time it is called, which is every time the loop reaches the check.

Since storing it will require width-1 less calls to im.getWidth() it is much more efficient no matter how you slice it.




Join us for AI Startup School this June 16-17 in San Francisco!

Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: