Why would a seasteading nation be inherently more vulnerable than a preexisting tiny nation?
Couldn't the same bilateral relationships with large states be developed by the former that afford the same level of protection that's currently enjoyed by the latter? And if you think not, how is that not merely a failure of imagination?
I do agree however that a venture like this would be much, much more likely to succeed on land. I just don't see your retort as a foregone conclusion.
Couldn't the same bilateral relationships with large states be developed by the former that afford the same level of protection that's currently enjoyed by the latter? And if you think not, how is that not merely a failure of imagination?
I do agree however that a venture like this would be much, much more likely to succeed on land. I just don't see your retort as a foregone conclusion.