I doubt it, that’s not the kind of feature that Teams customers want.
Most businesses have a need for discovery and audit, and Teams is a phone application with lawful interception needs, so you’re always going to have an interception capability.
End of the day, it’s a way to sell the full Microsoft stack… the only way to have an E2E encrypted meeting is to not allow dial-in, which is a way to encourage adoption of Teams as a unified communication solution. (Which is the strategy Zoom is attempting as well)
Lawful interception is a joke. Dragnet spying is what passive encryption breaking enables, and it's what the authorities are always after, not targeted surveillence for a specific purpose. If there were any respect for the fourth amendment by LEO and the government at large, I might sympathize a bit more with lawful interception schemes.
Meanwhile, in reality, I look forward to the need to have every person location-tracked even without a cell phone. I'll cynically bet its part of "the discussion" by the time I'm retirement age. Being untracked just presents too many dangers!
Most businesses have a need for discovery and audit, and Teams is a phone application with lawful interception needs, so you’re always going to have an interception capability.
End of the day, it’s a way to sell the full Microsoft stack… the only way to have an E2E encrypted meeting is to not allow dial-in, which is a way to encourage adoption of Teams as a unified communication solution. (Which is the strategy Zoom is attempting as well)