That may very well be. I am arguing against GGGP's implied point that is an inherently bad move to sell an (unproven, untested, undeveloped) idea for $100k. My argument is sustained by the general accepted worldwide idea market value and the very observation that the idea owner, the one that must have been the best informed about said value of that idea, decided to sell.
In short, I am saying: "He must have known better than us dumb commenters on the Internet, we must respect his decision, he could've done a lot worse."
In short, I am saying: "He must have known better than us dumb commenters on the Internet, we must respect his decision, he could've done a lot worse."
What point are you arguing?