Hacker News new | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit login

I would like to add another factor in your favor for this hypothesis. Naturally occurring viruses/bacteria tend to evolve to spread most effectively in conditions similar to how animals live: outside. COVID-19, conversely, seems to fair poorly outside and spreads most rapidly in indoor conditions not unlike one would expect in a human run laboratory environment.



Just to play devil's advocate, wouldn't COVID-19 also spread particularly efficiently in, say, a cave? Where bats live?


Wouldn't they have located the cave by now, and a load of bats infected with the virus.


There's a lot of bats, caves, and viruses. Virologists find new viruses all the time, why would you expect that they have surveyed enough that the fact that they haven't found a particular one is evidence it's not present?


The Chinese government are actively preventing the survey from occurring so that may be one reason we have not found it.


A virus with a novel mutation favoring humans would be successful infecting humans, period. I can't imagine any respiratory virus that wouldn't spread more effectively indoors. This "factor" is not particularly compelling (to me).


The way bats congregate and sleep in tight huddled up clusters would seem to be perfect for transmission.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: