Hacker News new | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit login

The Linux project absolutely cannot trust contributors to not be malicious. If they are doing that, then this work has successfully exposed a risk.



Then they would not be accepting any patches from any contributors, as the only truly safe option when dealing with an explicitly and admittedly, or assumed known malicious actor is to disregard their work entirely. You cannot know the scope of a malicious plot in advance, and any benign piece of work can be fatal in some unknown later totality.

As with all human projects, some level and balance of trust and security is needed to get work done. And the gradient shifts as downstream forks have higher security demands / less trust, and (in the case of nation states) more resources and time to both move slower, validate changes and establish and verify trust.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: