This does paint there side better, but it also makes me wonder if they're being wrongly accused of this current round of patches? That clarification says that they only submitted 3 patches, and that they used a random email address when doing so (so presumably no @umn.edu).
These ~200 patches from UMN being reverted might have nothing to do with these researchers at all.
Hopefully someone from the university clarifies what's happening soon before the angry mob tries to eat the wrong people.
These ~200 patches from UMN being reverted might have nothing to do with these researchers at all.
Hopefully someone from the university clarifies what's happening soon before the angry mob tries to eat the wrong people.