Hacker News new | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit login

> If the conclusion is "well, you can get access to the water supply and the only means to prevent it is to closely guard every brook, lake and river, needing half the population as guards".

I don't think that was the conclusion.




And what was? I cannot find constructive criticism in the related paper or any of your comments.




Join us for AI Startup School this June 16-17 in San Francisco!

Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: