Hacker News new | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit login

Based on the history of humanity, is there evidence we can fix our planet?



Following this logic, let's assume we can't. Then what are the chances we can plant a self-sufficient colony on a barren lifeless planet, all from a dying civilization on our still infinitely more hospitable homeworld?


Depends on whether the explorers self select for survival traits.


How can one be so deeply pessimistic about survival on a planet whose atmosphere we can safely breath and whose climate will likely be more amenable to us than Mars' even in a worst-case global heating scenario, and yet remain optimistic about an independently viable Mars colony?


You mean like self selecting billionaires?




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: