Hacker News new | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit login

It’s sad, even the place that is supposed to be fair isn’t due to money. Money rules too many of America’s systems. But I have a feeling that money will always find a way to be influential.



Money is just a proxy for power. Power is synonymous with influence.


There are plenty of influential broke people. Just look at YouTube.


Exactly. That's why money is a proxy, not equivalent to power.


A YouTuber cant use their likes to get the best lawyer can they? Even if they can (promos), it still means the legal system is unfair. The ones who benefit the system the most benefit from it.


Influencers can easily raise hundreds of thousands to fight legal cases if they have an audience that cares about their cause.

Edit: s/YouTubers/Influencers


And they can turn that influence into money very quickly. They might lose some of it when they cash in (or sell out), but it's pretty convertable.


And the conversion rate is good at quantifying how much actual influence a person has. Which may be less than they think.

How much influence a typical YouTuber with 10k subscribers have? Very little, actually - they can affect audience's thinking in a limited domain, or get them to buy some stuff to a limited degree. All restricted to how much a cohort of volunteers cares about what their entertainers tell them.

Contrast that with a person wielding a $100. They can literally get someone to do almost anything for them for a couple of hours. Or, in general, they can exchange it for $100 worth of goods and services provided by an industrial civilization. That's what hard influence looks like.


> even the place that is supposed to be fair isn’t due to money

What place is that?


The legal system (The court room)




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: