What is factually wrong about the article? It seems to me that what it is reporting is the dramatic drop on Friday.
Whether or not the price later regained what it lost on Friday does not really impact the main point of the article - the existence of such a drop, no matter how temporary it was.
Whether or not the price later regained what it lost on Friday does not really impact the main point of the article - the existence of such a drop, no matter how temporary it was.