I was simply pointing out that AI enhancement to find details otherwise not possible by humans that could be useful/accurate is very possible, and I don’t think you refuted it.
I also never denied that. But there's a difference between finding details that would otherwise go amiss (i.e. in lieu of a microscope revealing features invisible to the unaided eye) and reproducing data that simply isn't there to begin with (as is the core of the "enhance"-trope).
