But if you do it based on an unsubstantiated semi-incoherent one-sided account, I think we can safely say you don't care about the truth of the matter.
So, people or groups are immune from criticism as long as they refuse to speak on the issue? I guess that's one stance to take.
I think that's precisely what ICANN was going for. Reacting to it, in the eyes of some people, implies there's at least some truth to what the other party said.
So, people or groups are immune from criticism as long as they refuse to speak on the issue? I guess that's one stance to take.