Hacker News new | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit login

With kubernetes, you enable RBAC, and only allow each pod the absolute minimum of access required.

In my own setup, I have only five pods with any privileges: kubernetes-dashboard, nginx-ingress, prometheus, cert-manager, and the gitlab-runner, and of those only kubernetes-dashboard can modify existing pods in all spaces, cert-manager can only write secrets of its own custom type, and gitlab-runner can spawn non-privileged pods in its own namespace (but not mount anything from the host, nor any resources from any other namespace).

And when building docker images in the CI, I use google’s kaniko to build docker images from within docker without any privileges (it unpacks docker images for building and runs them inside the existing container, basically just chroot).

All these APIs are marked very clearly and obviously as DO NOT MAKE AVAILABLE PUBLICLY. If you still make them public, well it’s pretty much your own fault.




Does RBAC not limit these by default? Does cert-manger not already give itself restricted permission on install? Do I need to fix up my cluster right now? If so, do you have any example RBAC yamls? :D

> And when building docker images in the CI, I use google’s kaniko to build docker images from within docker without any privileges (it unpacks docker images for building and runs them inside the existing container, basically just chroot).

You can also use standalone buildkit which comes with the added benefit of being able to use the same builder locally natively.


No RBAC doesn't automatically do this. And many publicly available Helm charts are missing these basic security configurations. You should use Gatekeeper or similar to enforce these settings throughout your cluster.



Everyday DevOps strays further from SysAdmin's light.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: