Can't speak for this thing specifically, but FIDO2 keys in general:
- Yes, you have everything you need on every major OS/browser
- These devices are zeroconf; resetting it actually kills a security feature (key use increments) aiming at cloned devices
- The ideal backup for this is to have a separate key, both authorized. They don't need to have the same material, in fact, cloning it would be considered a weakness (how do you know someone hasn't cloned it without your knowledge?)
>- The ideal backup for this is to have a separate key, both authorized.
This in particular is important. Security is only as strong as your weakest link, so any backup methods (e.g. "forgot password" flows) might as well be your primary method, if you actually care to strongly secure things.
Adding another (or more) key gets you same-security redundancy if one fails or is lost. Nothing else will achieve this.
Degrading to "forgot password" may be entirely fine for [person's] use of a security key, but you must be explicit about that decision, or it's mostly security snake-oil.
This is one thing I hate about these keys though - some services only support one key, and for ones that support multiple, I struggle to figure out a storage system for my backup key. I don't want to keep it with me (because then I am at risk of losing both), but if I keep it separate, I need to remember to add it to new accounts - there's no way to see a list of accounts a key has been associated with.
Completely agreed. I don't have a good solution for that either, aside from "try harder". Which puts them in a fairly specific niche of reasonable use, tbh. And any site without the ability to set up multiple emails / keys / etc is not taking basic steps to allow its users to maintain access their account, so I think it's fair to rule them out simply as "bad sites" (though they're quite numerous, sadly).
For corporate purposes, they're pretty decent. If one is lost or fails or whatever, they can get you a new one, because the company can quite-strongly verify that you are you - much better than your average website. A bank or something might also be reasonable.
For general personal use... I dunno. You really don't want to be locked out permanently if you lose the key, which tends to mean they degrade to your email security, and they're just convenience tools. Which is more than nothing! Convenience that emails you when it is bypassed is better than no email when bypassed! But it's very far from the security claims that tend to go along with these keys.
Personally I'd like these keys to be a "fast login" convenience, and for email-reset to be delayed by a day or three with an easy "revoke" button. It's exceedingly rare that I truly need backup access immediately, and allowing it all the time is definitely opening the door to bulk theft of accounts.
I keep one of my keys in a fireproof safe at home, and the other on my keychain as my daily driver. If a site allows me to enroll multiple U2F keys, I just bring the backup to work (my home office, currently) with me the next day and enroll it then. For sites that only allow a single key (looking at you, AWS), I will usually enroll the key I have on me, and then when I have both, I write the same TOTP seed to both keys (usually by scanning the QR code with each key plugged into my phone before entering the one-time code used to verify and finalize TOTP enrollment) and use that instead so that there's effectively a TOTP duplicate.
This gives me a pretty convenient list of sites I've set up the Yubikey with (at least for TOTP), since Yubico's OTP app lists all the sites I've used it for.
If a site only allows a single U2F key to be registered, I'd rather have a backup with TOTP over the better security of a single U2F key, so this arrangement works reasonably well for me.
My threat model is focused on remote attacks, I consider physical access to my workstation game over. So one stays on my keys, one on my wife’s keys, and one stays plugged into my workstation.
If I’m enrolling the keys with a given service I make sure to add or remove all three at the same time so I don’t have to track which is associated with different accounts.
This isn't really an adequate threat model today though, where everyone has laptops. Having a workstation stolen for most us is actually extremely likely - probably more likely then someone trying to attack our credentials.
In this case though, full-disk encryption and TPM usage is the mitigation - provided the disk goes dead when anyone short of a nation-state tries to manipulate it, you're good.
This is the biggest weakness of U2F unfortunately.
My approach is to keep a list (a simple text file) of what services are used for U2F, and which keys are enrolled with it.
Most services ask or require you to name the token you enrol (if they support multiple tokens) - I gave the tokens names so they're consistent.
Now I have 2 ways to check - logging into a site, you can see what keys are enrolled. And as fallback, I can use my underlying text file and see which keys I enrolled.
You just need to make a point to check the file once every so often (at least first time you are near your backup key after having edited the text file).
I've seen some interesting approaches (on modifiable tokens where keys can be exported) where they configure a backup key as a mirror of the main key, but with the counter advanced forward such that using the backup will invalidate the regular (thus alerting you to the use of the backup by an adversary, as long as the service properly validates the counter).
I can't think of an easy solution to this (it is effectively the key distribution problem) without adding complexity (like manager software for tokens, and a Shamir's secret sharing style way to export a token's root key through SSS such that it can be recovered by a quorum of keys in an emergency). That breaks various aspects of the threat model though.
Perhaps there's a less complex way to do it though? Like having up to N persistent public key slots on the token, where public keys of your other tokens can reside. When registering, the generated key is also encrypted "to" those tokens, and sent as supplementary key handles. You'd need to add a pairing relationship to validate authenticity of the key handles, but I suppose it could work.
I keep one backup key in a fire safe at my residence (in case I lose my primary key somehow) and one with a trusted party in a different state (in case Mt. Rainier explodes and the entire state of Washington is lost - though at that point I have bigger concerns)
In non-pandemic times, I visit at least once a year and update things then.
At the end of the day, so long as I can get access to my email and at least one bank, I'm confident that I can recover everything else in time. As such, if I have some recent account that isn't covered by that key I'm not particularly concerned.
Having multiple keys without auditing when the backups are used, though, feels wrong. And that is my main gripe with these right now. Very hard to get any system to help build the habit of using the things. Most places default to remember your login. Basically forever.
While not cryptographic level auditing, this is arguably a UX feature for sites to implement -- on their inevitable loading spinner after login, they could show you the U2F tokens enrolled, and their most recent use on a small timeline. If your cold backup suddenly goes from ancient to now, that ought to be looked into!
Regards habits, I find U2F is so easy to use that there's no real issue there. The bigger issue is that (relatively) few services support it. I'd much prefer to use it over TOTP phone generated codes, but far more sites seem to support phone app generated codes (while pretending you need their proprietary app to use them, even when it's just plain TOTP) or, even worse, SMS!
Backups with lower grade technical security are possible if you’re willing to compromise speed. For example an offline process where you have to present yourself, in person, and show N forms of ID, to the service provider or their agent with a mandatory M day delay. Or where you can have X other users, who can log in, vouch for you to reset your access token.
- Yes, you have everything you need on every major OS/browser
- These devices are zeroconf; resetting it actually kills a security feature (key use increments) aiming at cloned devices
- The ideal backup for this is to have a separate key, both authorized. They don't need to have the same material, in fact, cloning it would be considered a weakness (how do you know someone hasn't cloned it without your knowledge?)