The statement is odd, at the same time, it's not outrageous for him to make in the sense that - lines of code notwithstanding - the underlying science i.e. the application of the product is the thing in question.
It's a pretty interesting case.
At least the core nature of the algorithm should be made public if we're going to use it for public inquisition.
It's a pretty interesting case.
At least the core nature of the algorithm should be made public if we're going to use it for public inquisition.